Abortion Restriction Laws and Mobility of Scientists

We track the enactment of targeted regulation of abortion providers (TRAP) laws in the U.S. and analyze 4.98 million person-year mobility records for 535,568 biomedical scientists from 1990 to 2018. Our estimations reveal a 0.8-1.6 percentage-point increase in scientists’ relocation probability after states enacted abortion-restrictive laws, with substantially stronger effects among junior scientists (1.6-3.9 percentage points). Anti-abortion states also became less likely to be chosen as relocation destinations, particularly by higher-quality scientists. These responses appear driven by ideological misalignment and research-related concerns in fields affected by abortion-related regulation. We further find that states that have adopted TRAP laws experienced declines in scientific research quality, federal research funding, and patenting in relevant technological fields and among local firms.

Beril Yalcinkaya, postdoc, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania; Waverly W. Ding, Associate Professor of Strategy and Entrepreneurship, R.H. Smith School of Business, University of Maryland;