The Price to Pay for a Successful M&A
Companies with internal control weaknesses should stay away from acquisitions. Otherwise they may pay more in the long run.
Oct 04, 2017

The Price to Pay for a Successful M&A

As Featured In 
Contemporary Accounting Research

Why Firms Shouldn’t Knock SOX: How the Regulation Impacts M&A  

Though many corporate executives balk at the expense created by requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, a law enacted to head off accounting fraud, not having measures in place could be even more costly for public companies. That’s because weak accounting practices lead to poor M&A decisions, according to new research from Emanuel Zur at the University of Maryland’s Robert H. Smith School of Business and two co-researchers. Mergers and acquisitions are the largest and most visible investments made by companies, with deals totaling more than $1 trillion annually.

A string of corporate accounting scandals that led to the demise of Enron and WorldCom in the early 2000s pushed Congress to enact the Sarbanes-Oxley Act to require public companies to protect against accounting fraud. The law requires CEOs and CFOs to assess the effectiveness of internal controls on financial reporting and have that assessment validated by an outside auditor. Firms with ineffective internal controls must disclose the existence and nature of their internal control weaknesses. Those weaknesses don’t just affect operations, earnings and cost of debt or equity for a firm. Zur’s research reveals they also can lead companies to make poor investment decisions and overpay when acquiring new companies. These firms also see lower stock returns in the period surrounding an acquisition and lower returns in the two years following. 

The researchers conclude that companies that have reported weaknesses should stay away from acquisitions until they fix their internal problems. Otherwise, they’ll overpay for the acquisition (an average of extra 6 percent of deal premium) and their stock will perform worse in the months and years after. The market responds more negatively to firms that pay high premiums in acquisitions, suggests the research.

The researchers point to poor quality information generated by ineffective internal controls, or the underlying issues that caused the poor accounting, that hinder management decision-making in M&A deals and drive up the price a firm has to pay to acquire a new target.

Zur and his co-authors also looked at firms that had previously reported weaknesses and had fixed them. They didn’t pay as much to acquire new firms and the market didn’t penalize those companies’ stock returns, providing an incentive for rooting out and correcting financial reporting problems. 

Read more: Acquirer Internal Control Weaknesses in the Market for Corporate Control is featured in Contemporary Accounting Research.

About the Author(s)

Emanuel Zur, PhD, Assistant Professor of Accounting and Information Assurance, joined the faculty this fall 2013. Prior to joining Maryland's AIA faculty, Emanuel was an assistant professor of accounting at Baruch College and a visiting assistant professor at MIT's Sloan School of Management. He holds an LLB in law and a BA in economics from Tel-Aviv University in Israel, as well as an MPhil in management, and a PhD in business administration (accounting) from New York University's Stern School of Business. Before entering academia, Emanuel worked as a consultant for EY and as a lawyer for one of the leading law firms in Israel.

More in


Slow Motion Earnings Revisions on Wall Street
Time required to collect, process and distribute information ranges from nine minutes to nearly five days for Thomson Reuters.
Nov 15, 2017
Size Matters With Signatures
Researchers find a correlation between declining firm performance, narcissism and large signature size on annual SEC filings.
Oct 26, 2017
Understanding the Risks of Privatization
While private company ownership comes with benefits, new research from the Smith School reveals it may not be for the risk-averse.
Oct 19, 2017