Better Communication For Remote Teams
Email, instant messaging and Slack have been called essential for optimal communication among virtual work teams. But do these technologies really deserve the credit they get?
Oct 18, 2018

Better Communication For Remote Teams

Five Keys To Improved Communication Among Remote Teams

Oct 18, 2018
As Featured In 
Sloan Management Review

Email, instant messages, video conferencing and Slack each have been touted as instrumental in improving communication for virtual work teams. But do these technologies really deserve the credit they get?

New research from Maryland Smith’s Kathryn M. Bartol and co-author George Washington University’s N. Sharon Hill finds that the effectiveness of virtual communication depends not on the technologies themselves, but how they are used.

The researchers studied globally dispersed teams in a large multinational firm, asking team members to rate one another on virtual communication behaviors culled from a growing body of research on virtual teams. Specifically, the teams were asked to focus on five facets of communication: matching the technology to the task, making intentions clear, staying in sync, being responsive and supportive, and being open and inclusive. The researchers averaged individual scores to establish a score for each team.

The researchers controlled for outside factors — past experience in working on virtual teams was one and the level of IT support was another. And they found teams that scored better on the five key behaviors also were seen by their bosses as better-performing.

They produced deliverables that were of higher quality, completed tasks on time, worked productively as a team, and met or exceeded the goals set for them. 

For every 10 percent that a team outscored other teams on virtual communication effectiveness, they also outscored those teams by 13 percent on overall performance.

“Although the research focused on dispersed teams, we believe the same strategies can help co-located teams, which increasingly depend on virtual collaboration tools,” Bartol and her co-author wrote recently of their findings in MIT Sloan Management Review.

For bosses in particular, the study offers some important advice, says Bartol, the Robert H. Smith Professor of Leadership and Innovation and Chair of the Management and Organization Department  at the University of Maryland’s Robert H. Smith School of Business. Bartol is also the co-director of the Center for Leadership, Innovation and Change.

“Don’t assume that everyone on your team is aware of potential pitfalls with virtual communication or of the five key behaviors that improve performance,” she says.

Instead, managers should draft a “team charter” that defines expectations of how teams will work together, one that includes the technologies that a team should use for certain tasks. Highly sensitive or interpersonal issues, the research suggests, shouldn’t be hashed out over email. The charter might also detail a format for communications. For example, highlighted or bold-faced text could be used to draw attention to action items. And it might set a plan for keeping teams coordinated, with a strategy for setting and monitoring project deadlines.

The authors also recommend setting an expectation of how long the team will take to respond to new requests and rule of thumb for which communications are widely shared with the team, and which remain in inner circles. Some teams, Bartol says, “Use the ‘would you want to know?’ rule of thumb.” 

“We’ve found that clearly conveyed norms do make a difference.”

And so does leadership, Bartol says. “Leaders can rely on those team members to model effective behaviors — and can model the behaviors themselves — to raise the whole group to a higher standard.”

Read more: Five Ways to Improve Communication in Virtual Teams is featured in MIT Sloan Management Review.

About the Author(s)

Kathryn M. Bartol

Dr. Kathryn M. Bartol is the Robert H. Smith Professor of Leadership and Innovation and Chair of the Management and Organization Department at the Robert H. Smith School of Business, University of Maryland, College Park. She is the co-director of the Center for Leadership, Innovation and Change (CLIC). She holds an Executive Coach Certification from the Columbia University Coaching Certification Program.

More in


Second Chances After a Fall from Power
Followers sometimes continue to believe in a leader even after loss of status. New Maryland Smith research explores why.
Jul 23, 2019
Bad Bosses Make Themselves Feel Bad Too
Call it karma. Abusive leaders cause suffering not only for their employees, but also for themselves.
Jun 27, 2019
When Noncompete Agreements Hurt Everyone
What happens when these contracts are enforceable and used en masse? New Maryland Smith research finds that negative consequences are in store for all workers.
May 28, 2019