An Analyst's Actual Impact

Bank Analysts Pay For Negligence With Their Careers, Research Finds

Feb 11, 2019
As Featured In 
Journal of Accounting and Economics

Don’t show your bias or slack off in your reports if you’re an analyst at an investment bank and want to move up in your career, finds new research from the University of Maryland’s Robert H. Smith School of Business. The research, from visiting finance professor Oya Altinkiliç, finds that analysts who issue negligent reports – characterized as overly optimistic or too bold with recommendations, or those that simply piggyback on earlier reports or corporate news – jeopardize their careers.

“We find analysts issuing negligent reports are less likely to be promoted and they are more likely to move down,” says Altinkiliç. “We also find that top banks, which have a higher reputation capital to protect, punish such analysts more than other banks.”

Securities analysts at investment banks have long been seen as critical players in capital markets for the reports they issue. The reports provide recommendations to buy, sell or hold particular securities, or offer predictions when forecasting company’s earnings. But Altinkiliç’s previous research contradicts the idea that analysts actually move markets. She and her co-authors found that most of those reports – up to 98 percent – simply piggyback on corporate news and don’t offer new information. “We don’t find that analysts actually move the prices of securities when they issue reports.”

Altinkiliç’s new research looks at how the reports impact the career outcomes for analysts, who are most often employed by investment banks. The banks monitor the analysts because the analysts put their bank’s reputation on the line when they issue recommendations and make earnings forecasts.

“They have always cared. If you are hiring investment analysts in-house, and your bank’s name is associated with their reports, you are going to monitor that employee,” says Altinkiliç. But this research is the first to look at that monitoring and the bonding effect of reputation. The labor market for analysts is very competitive, she says, with an average turnover rate of 20-25 percent each year. The research reveals some of that is because investment banks are disciplining their analysts for negligent reports.

“From an academic research point of view, this is a relatively controversial result,” says Altinkiliç. “Analysts, still to this day, are being seen as movers of the market. When they say something, the market follows. They can impact prices of a firm up 3 to 4 percent every time they issue a report. That idea has been on the table since 1980, and there have been several hundred papers in top journals based on the idea that analysts are informative and that their careers flourish based on their reports.”

“We don’t find that,” says Altinkiliç. “We find that if they use these attributes – being too optimistic, being bold, following news – these are actually seen especially by top banks as negative attributes and they punish the analysts for that.”

The researchers also looked at analysts with institutional investor awards to identify star analysts, but these award-winners represent such a small portion of analysts, that they offer too little reputation power for the typical analyst. In each industry, only one or two analysts are given that award each year out of more than 4,000, says Altinkiliç, so the awards don’t offer a good measure of reputation for most analysts.

Altinkiliç says the research shows the big picture view that capital markets are highly competitive and, through the monitoring and bonding by the investment bank intermediaries, are keeping tabs on analysts: “Negligent analysts do not survive in these markets. They either move down, or they move out altogether.”

Read more: Investment Bank Monitoring and Bonding of Security Analysts' Research is featured in the Journal of Accounting and Economics.

About the Author(s)

Oya Altınkılıç

Oya Altınkılıç joined the Robert H. Smith finance faculty as a visitor in 2018. Previously she was faculty at the University of Pittsburgh’s J.M. Katz Graduate School of Business and George Washington University’s Business School. Her research interests are investment banking; corporate financings; security analysts; security issuance; and corporate governance. Her research has been published in top-tier journals: Journal of Financial Economics, Review of Financial Studies, Journal of Accounting and Economics, and Management Science. She has taught PhD, MBA, and undergraduate courses in corporate finance, valuation methods, and international finance. Her research has been featured The Financial Times, New York Times DealBook, Reuters, The Guardian, Tages-Anzeiger, COIL, Vedomosti, FierceFinance, L’Agefi, Fox Business News, CNBC U.S., and CNBC Africa.

More in


The Trouble With Being Public in Emerging Markets
You'd think the world’s major multinational, publicly traded firms might have an advantage across the developing world over privately owned rivals. Not so, according to new research. And the reason why is a bit surprising.
Feb 19, 2020
Do Institutional Investors Have An Edge on News?
Research finds no advantage, just superior skills for institutional investors when it comes to reading and reacting to news with stock trades.
Jan 30, 2020
A New Way To Predict Mutual Fund Returns
With so many mutual fund companies and so many pricing options out there, how should an investor choose?
Nov 01, 2018
Robert H. Smith School of Business
Map of Robert H. Smith School of Business
University of Maryland
Robert H. Smith School of Business
Van Munching Hall
College Park MD 20742