Here’s What’s Missing From the Shareholder Primacy Debate

Critics Err When They Ignore Basic Risk/Reward Economics

Nov 02, 2018

SMITH BRAIN TRUST – Recent op-eds in Fortune, Financial Times and Stanford Social Innovation Review all come down hard on shareholder primacy — the idea of putting investors first above all other stakeholders.

Finance professor Michael Faulkender, associate dean of master’s programs at the University of Maryland’s Robert H. Smith School of Business, acknowledges that companies stumble when they overlook the interests of customers, employees, suppliers, communities and the environment. But critics of shareholder primacy err, he says, when they ignore basic risk/reward economics.

“The shareholders are the ones taking the risk,” he says. “If the product fails, the employee still gets paid. The supplier gets paid. The customer chooses whether or not to buy the product. The other stakeholders aren’t bearing the residual risk. It is the shareholders that are.”

The Redeeming Qualities of Shareholder Primacy: Finance professor Michael Faulkender at the University of Maryland's Robert H. Smith School of Business explains the rationale for putting shareholder interests first.

Oftentimes, investors provide money up front before any product or service exists. They must fund the building of infrastructure, the research and development of a product, the hiring and training of employees and the purchase of raw materials without guarantee of profit. “If it is the shareholders who are going to take the losses when the product fails, it’s the shareholders who should receive the residual benefits when the product succeeds,” Faulkender says.

That doesn’t mean companies should exploit other stakeholders. “Those other stakeholders have to be compensated such that they are willing to participate,” Faulkender says. “But what it means is that once you have sufficiently encouraged them to participate, any leftovers belong to the shareholders.”

Faulkender, nominated in 2018 as assistant secretary of the U.S. Treasury for economic policy, explains the rationale for putting shareholder interests first in a Maryland Smith video, The Redeeming Qualities of Shareholder Primacy (2:18)...



About the Expert(s)

Michael Faulkender's research focuses on empirical corporate finance in the areas of capital structure, risk management, corporate liquidity, and executive compensation. His work has been published in the Journal of Finance, Journal of Financial Economics, and Review of Financial Studies and has been cited in the Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, and The New York Times. He was awarded the Barclay's Global Investors/Michael Brennan Best Paper Award in the Review of Financial Studies in 2013, was runner up for that prize in 2006, and won the Jensen Prize for Corporate Finance – Second Prize in the Journal of Financial Economics in 2013.

More In


What’s To Lose from a Corporate Tax Hike?

The Biden administration's proposed $2 trillion infrastructure bill is expected to be funded in part by an increased corporate tax rate. But changes of that magnitude always carry consequences, says Maryland Smith's Michael Faulkender, and the impact of these policies could be felt years down the road.

Apr 12, 2021
The Weird New World of NFTs

For those who have regrets about missing out on the rise of cryptocurrency, the next big thing is here – NFTs, or non-fungible tokens. But instead of trading currency, these tokens come in the form of pictures and video clips. While unconventional, they might just be the next digital gold, says Maryland Smith's David Kass.

Mar 31, 2021
Lessons from Citi’s Revlon Error

A recent $500 million “clerical error” at Citigroup exposes an inherent weakness in big banks that provides lessons to be learned.

Mar 22, 2021
Robert H. Smith School of Business
Map of Robert H. Smith School of Business
University of Maryland
Robert H. Smith School of Business
Van Munching Hall
College Park MD 20742