SPRING 2005
VOL. 6 NO. 2

SMITH BUSINESS: Home - Site Index - Previous Issue - Archives

Subscribe to the print version. It's free!

Feature Fatigue   •   Word of Mouse  •   Faculty Awards    •   More
Understanding the process of mid-life career transition may help employers keep their employees.
Considering a job change? You’re not alone. Gone are the days of working through your entire career with one organization. Today most Americans will change careers at some point, and people between ages of 35 and 54 seem especially likely to express their discontent with their current job by leaving it. Employers are grappling with ways to keep these valuable workers, who often have progressed to a mid-point in their careers and have valuable skills and knowledge.

What drives mid-lifers to jump ship? Smith PhD student Holly Slay developed a model that relies on a person’s sense of identity and social networks to explain the thoughts and processes that lead people to mid-life career transitions.

“A doctor may have a self-identity based on society’s perception of what a physician should be: competent, concerned, able to help others.

 If that physician is in an HMO situation and feels that she isn’t able to provide good care to her patients because of the structure of her HMO, then she may experience an identity discrepancy. She says ‘That’s not who I am,’” says Slay. At that point the physician may consider a career transition.

Slay also found that who you know is as important as what you know when it comes to making a career change. People with a more diverse social network may consider a wider range of career choices when it is time to make a change—from physician to chef, for instance. And a person whose social network affirms their career choice is less likely to leave the job at all.

Slay’s award-winning paper was co-authored by Ian Williamson, assistant professor of management and organization, and Susan Taylor, professor of management.

Foreign portfolio investment gives a big boost to small businesses, at home and abroad.
Small firms represent 99 percent of all businesses, employ half of those Americans who have jobs and create two-thirds of the job openings in the United States. These statistics are similar across the globe. Small firms are an important driving factor for the global economy, but they experience some significant roadblocks: lack of liquidity, an excessive sensitivity to government regulation, difficulty in obtaining equity capital, and size-bias from potential investors. Smith School PhD candidate April M. Knill found that foreign portfolio investment has a positive effect on small firms, which benefit from this infusion of capital directly, through investments, or indirectly, through bank lending.

“There is more of a trend toward foreign portfolio investment among investors in developed nations. As individual investors become savvier, they’re less frightened to invest overseas,” says Knill. Improvements in a country’s foreign investment environment in less-developed nations can help alleviate financial constraints of both large and smaller firms. Knill believes that easing foreign investment portfolio restrictions on cash flows, stabilizing these investment cash flows and improving the treatment of foreign companies and investors could have a significant, positive influence on the lifetime of smaller firms.

Knill is advised by Vojislav Maksimov, Bank of America Professor of Finance at Smith.

 

Smith’s PhD program is extremely rigorous, with an emphasis on quantitative research underlying most disciplines. One of the program’s benefits is the tremendous amount of interaction students have with Smith’s world-class faculty. Together they are producing award-winning research, just some of which is featured on these pages.

Highly reputable firms set the standard for voluntary disclosure. Many other firms just follow the crowd.

Within a two-day period in July 2001, UAL Corp., AMR Corp., and Northwest Airlines all released their capital expenditure plans. This wave-like pattern of voluntary disclosure, known as “herding,” can also be seen in companies’ disclosures of their revenue warnings and accounting misstatements.

Firms are required to disclose information to shareholders, regulatory agencies and the general public through mandated financial reports and other regulated filings. But firms can also selectively disclose information through news releases, shareholder meetings, analyst presentations, and conference calls. Nerissa Brown, a Smith PhD candidate in the accounting and information assurance department, examined how firms in the same industry tend to herd in their timing of capital expenditure forecasts.

Brown observed that a firm’s decision to release capital budgeting information is strongly associated with the proportion of firms within its industry that have already disclosed such information. As more firms choose to voluntarily release information, the more pressure there is on other firms in the same industry to follow suit.

A company’s reputation seems to affect the degree to which it chooses to follow the crowd rather than set the standard. Brown found that less reputable firms are more likely to herd on other firms’ disclosure decisions.

Herding is a rational behavior, but it can lead to poor decisions if a firm infers the wrong information or follows the bad choices made by others. This may induce managers to disclose even when private signals indicate that disclosure is not in the best interest of the firm, or it can lead managers to withhold information even when private signals suggest that disclosure is beneficial.

Brown is advised by Lawrence A. Gordon, Ernst & Young Alumni Professor of Managerial Accounting and Russell Wermers, associate professor of finance.

  SMITH BUSINESS

Copyright 2005 Robert H. Smith School of Business