Smith
Faculty Opinion Article
 |
By Dr. Peter Morici, Professor
of International Business
E-MAIL
WEB SITE |
July 3,
2008
Economy
Loses 62,000 Jobs in June Crisis
Grips the Job Market
Today, the Labor Department
reported the economy lost 62,000
payroll jobs in June, after losing
62,000 jobs in May. Economists
expected a 50,000 loss in June.
Governments added 29,000 jobs,
and private sector employment fell
91,000. Businesses have become too
pessimistic about the outlook for
the economy, and the capacity of the
Bush Administration and Federal
Reserve to manage it. While exports
remain strong, domestic demand
remains weak and shows few signs of
recovering.
The Labor Department reported the
unemployment rate steady at 5.5
percent. However, this statistic was
greatly affected by the number of
discouraged adults who have left the
labor force. Factoring in the
decline in the number of adults
participating in the labor force,
the unemployment rate is closer to
7.2 percent.
Six straight months of job losses
are the strongest evidence yet that
the economy has slipped into a
recession of uncertain depth and
duration. The banking crisis, high
oil prices and the ballooning trade
deficit China are causing employers
to relocate to Asia rather than be
caught in the U.S. Tsunami.
Retail sales and personal
consumption expenditures were
stronger in May, as personal income
got a bump from tax-rebate stimulus
checks. But this one-time jolt did
not mask very weak sales of consumer
durables such appliances and
automobiles. Along with weakness in
housing and nonresidential
construction, credit shortages and
tepid automobile sales are causing
businesses to trim investments in
new capacity and hiring plans. The
crisis is clearly worsening.
Exports are lifting sales and
employment in commodities and basic
industrial materials, but overall a
weaker dollar against the euro and
other currencies and the resulting
increase in exports are not enough
to save the economy from recession.
Energy and food price inflation
have not infected other sectors of
the economy. The market-based price
index for personal consumption
expenditures, which is closely
watched by Federal Reserve
policymakers, has risen only 0.1
percent each of the last four
months, and has risen only 1.9
percent over the last 12 months.
Movements in long bond rates do not
reflect a pronounced shift in
inflation expectations.
Yet, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben
Bernanke is complaining about rising
inflation expectations and
brandishing higher interest rates to
quell inflation fears. At a time
when the data says the opposite
about inflation and many
manufacturers and service providers
lack the pricing power to push
forward rising energy and commodity
prices, the Federal Reserves
pronouncements look more like
sorcery than science.
That’s a recipe for a housing
market collapse, stock market rout
and job market disaster.
U.S. Policies Worsening
Inflation, Recession Risks
Tight global markets are pushing
up U.S. food and energy and food
prices and headline inflation, but
U.S. energy, exchange rate and
monetary policies are exacerbating
problems and making likely a
protracted period of slow growth.
The ethanol program is pushing up
food prices, and robust growth in
China and elsewhere in Asia are
pushing up energy and raw material
prices. The Fed could only
marginally affect those pressures by
constraining U.S. growth through
higher interest rates.
China is controlling domestic
prices for gasoline and other
refined products, subsidizing oil
imports with the dollars it obtains
through its purchases of U.S.
dollars to sustain an undervalued
yuan, and increasing demand for oil
more rapidly than it is contracting
in the United States. The combined
dynamic of U.S.-Chinese integration
and Chinese intervention in currency
and oil markets is to drive up
exports and growth in China, drive
up gasoline and other energy prices
in the United States, and slow
growth and increase unemployment in
the United States.
Treasury’s inaction regarding
China’s policy of buying dollars for
yuan to sustain an undervalued
currency permits China to continue
to subsidize manufactured exports
and oil imports, and expand its
purchases of oil more rapidly than
the United States reduces imports.
This is pushing up the international
price of oil, gasoline and diesel
prices, cushioning the Chinese
economy from the U.S. economic
slowdown, and exacerbating the
economic slowdown in the United
States.
The Federal Reserve’s aggressive
interest rates cuts have had a
limited effect on GDP and employment
growth, and the stimulus package is
not large enough to compensate for
rising gasoline prices and the
meltdown in the credit and housing
markets.
The stimulus package at $152
billion is hardly enough to offset
higher gasoline prices, and less
than half as large as the losses
taken by the major New York banks
and their customers on subprime
securities. The stimulus package is
lessening the pain imposed by
soaring gas prices and flagging
domestic demand for U.S.-made goods
and serves, but it is insufficient
to head off a recession.
The Federal Reserve is in crisis,
because its mix of policies
addresses an old style recession,
one premised on inadequate demand
but solid financial institutions.
The current recession has its
origins in questionable banking
practices and a breakdown of
investor trust in the integrity of
Wall Street’s most venerable banks
and investment houses.
Federal Reserve regulators,
apparently lacking appreciation for
the gravity of these problems, have
focused mostly on urging banks to
raise new capital without effective
parallel efforts to reform bank
business models and practices.
Often, new capital has been provided
by sovereign wealth funds or private
equity firms, which lack
sophistication in the intricacies of
commercial and mortgage banking and
demand few changes in bank
management policies.
The result is sophisticated
buyers of fixed income securities,
such as insurance companies and
pension funds, remain unwilling to
accept loan-backed securities from
the banks. The market for mortgage
backed securities issued by
commercial banks has evaporated.
For similar reasons banks cannot
raise additional new capital.
Investors that initially came to the
rescue of Citigroup and others have
been burned by falling share prices.
Not seeing meaningful changes in
management personnel and practices
at the banks, investors are not
willing to commit additional new
capital to these failing
institutions.
The housing sector has been in a
recession for months, in significant
measure, because the market for
mortgage-backed securities has
broken down. At this time, banks can
only write conforming loans that can
be sold to Fannie Mae or held on
their balance sheets. The bond
market will not accept
mortgage-backed securities
underwritten by the major Wall
Street banks, and this significantly
curtails the market for less than
prime securities.
The whole chain that creates
financing for mortgages and other
consumer loans has been corrupted
from loan officers to banks that
bundle loans into securities, to
bond rating agencies like Standard
and Poor’s who demand payments from
banks instead of charging investors
to evaluate mortgage-backed
securities.
The Federal Reserve and Treasury
need to prod the private banks to
reform lending practices, and to
encourage bond rating agencies to
return to investor financed ratings.
Unfortunately, Henry Paulson and Ben
Bernanke have been shy to do this,
and the Democratic leadership in the
Senate and House is too busy raising
campaign money on Wall Street to
prod the Administration to
meaningful action on banking reform.
The economy is sailing through
dangerous, unchartered waters, and
Henry Paulson and Ben Bernanke, the
helmsmen, seem confused and
unsteady, adding to pessimism about
the outlook for U.S. GDP growth and
jobs.
The Fed’s inadequate response to
the credit crisis is undermining the
exchange for the dollar against the
euro. Cheap dollars permit Europeans
to bid up the price of oil, further
pushing up U.S. gasoline prices and
exacerbating the U.S. economic
slowdown.
The bottom line, Treasury and
Federal Reserve policies toward
China and the banks are
manufacturing higher oil prices,
inflation and recession.
It is no surprise the economy is
hemorrhaging jobs.
Weak Wage Growth and
Unemployment
Construction, manufacturing,
finance, and retail trade displayed
weakness, reflecting significantly
slower GDP growth.
Wages increased a moderate 0.6
cents per hour, or 0.3 percent.
Moderate wage and strong labor
productivity growth should help keep
core inflation in check, and this
should help abate Federal Reserve
concerns about nonfood and nonenergy
price inflation, so-called core
inflation, as it navigates the
fallout from the subprime crisis.
What problems the Fed faces in the
core will be a pass-through from
higher food and energy prices, not a
permanent increase in inflation
expectations.
The unemployment rate was 5.5
percent in June. However, these
numbers belie more fundamental
weakness in the job market.
Discouraged by a sluggish job
market, many more adults are sitting
on the sidelines, neither working
nor looking for work, than when
George Bush took the helm. Factoring
in discouraged workers raises the
unemployment rate to about to 7.2
percent. As the economy slows
further this figure will likely
exceed 8 or even 9 percent.
Overall, the pace of employment
growth indicates the economy is
settling into a troubling malaise.
Second quarter growth in GDP should
be close to 1 percent, thanks to a
bump from the stimulus package.
However, the recent surge in retail
sales will prove temporary. Sales of
durable goods, like appliances and
lawn mowers, continue to slump, Ford
and GM have announced further
production cutbacks, and builders
have an 11 month supply of unsold
new homes. Auto production and
housing starts should not improve
much until the fourth quarter, at
least, and those conditions will
feed into the rest of the economy.
The jobs outlook should not markedly
improve until at least the fourth
quarter..
Manufacturing, Construction
and the Quality of Jobs
Going forward, the economy will
add some jobs for college graduates
with technical specialties in
finance, health care, education, and
engineering. However, for high
school graduates without specialized
technical skills or training and
college graduates with only liberal
arts diplomas, jobs offering good
pay and benefits remain tough to
find. For those workers, who compose
about half the working population,
the quality of jobs continues to
spiral downward.
Historically, manufacturing and
construction offered workers with
only a high school education the
best pay, benefits and opportunities
for skill attainment and
advancement. Troubles in these
industries push ordinary workers
into retailing, hospitality and
other industries where pay often
lags.
Construction employment fell by
43,000 in June. This is a terrible
indicator for future GDP growth.
Retailing shed 7.5 thousand jobs,
and financial services lost 10.1.
Manufacturing has lost 33,000
jobs, and over the last 97 months
manufacturing has shed more than 3.8
million jobs. Were the trade deficit
cut in half, manufacturing would
recoup at least 2 million of those
jobs, U.S. growth would exceed 3.5
percent a year, household savings
performance would improve, and
borrowing from foreigners would
decline.
The dollar remains too strong
against the Chinese yuan, Japanese
yen and other Asian currencies. The
Chinese government artificially
suppresses the value of the yuan to
gain competitive advantage, and the
yuan sets the pattern for other
Asian currencies. These currencies
are critical to reducing the non-oil
U.S. trade deficit, and instigating
a recovery in U.S. employment in
manufacturing and
technology-intensive services that
compete in trade.
Peter Morici is a professor at the
University of Maryland School of
Business and former Chief Economist at
the U.S. International Trade Commission.