| Smith
Faculty Opinion Article |
March 1, 2006 |
Personal Income Up $75.2 Billion in
January
Savings Negative Seven of the Last Eight
Months
By Dr. Peter
Morici, Professor of International
Business
Today, the Commerce Department
reported in January personal income
increased $75.2 billion or 0.7
percent, disposable personal income
increased $50.2 billion or 0.5
percent, and personal consumption
expenditures increased $76.7 billion
or 0.9 percent.
Most significantly, personal
outlays exceeded disposable income
by $63.3 billion or 0.7 percent. In
December, personal outlays exceeded
disposable income by $35.7 billion
or 0.4 percent.
Personal savings have been
negative seven of the last eight
months, and consumers are critically
stressed. This should raise a
caution flag for the Fed but
Chairman Bernanke seems intent on
pushing up interest rates and
driving core inflation below 2
percent.
Personal savings should improve
in the months ahead. Consumers are
overextended and a correction is
inevitable. Pushing up interest
rates further will hurry the process
but raising rates too much could
kill the economic expansion.
Outlook for Savings
Household savings should improve
regardless of Fed policy.
Consumers have been able to
increase spending more rapidly than
their incomes by borrowing against
the rapidly rising values of their
homes and piling on credit card
debt. In recent months, stressed by
higher gasoline and heating costs,
most consumers have had few
short-term options but to pony up.
Now the string appears to be running
out.
Prices for existing homes have
fallen since June, and credit card
delinquencies are near 5 percent.
No longer able to take equity
from their homes, consumers will
make adjustments. New car purchases
will tilt toward smaller vehicles,
which are both less expensive and
more fuel efficient. New homes will
offer fewer amenities and perhaps
less finished square footage too.
The combination of higher
interest rates and declining housing
prices will encourage consumers to
rebuild their balance sheets and
begin saving again. That will slow
the economy, for sure.
Outlook for the Economy and
Fed Policy
Consumer spending, which accounts
for 70 percent of GDP, has been the
primary driver behind the economic
recovery the last four years. Eight
straight months of negative
household savings indicate
policymakers can no longer count on
consumers to power growth. With the
federal government trimming
discretionary spending and the trade
deficit near record levels,
investment must pick up the slack
but that is unlikely.
Commercial construction is likely
to pick up, especially in and around
cities powered by knowledge-based
industries, finance, and durable
goods manufacturers, which other
than Ford, GM and their suppliers,
are recovering.
However, most new commercial
construction will be limited to
office and retail space, as durable
goods manufacturers modernize
equipment and squeeze more out of
existing structures. Gains in
commercial construction will be
partly offset by a weaker housing
sector. Investments in producer
durables and technology will be
decent but not spectacular.
Together, gains in construction,
producer durables and technology
spending will not be enough to keep
the economy expanding at the pace
established in 2004 and 2005.
Look for the economy to slow by
the third quarter but the Fed wont
see enough tangible evidence of this
until May. That is why most
forecasters are banking on two more
increases in the Fed Funds rate.
The minutes of the January 31
Open Market Committee meeting
revealed the regional Federal
Reserve Banks forecasts for GDP,
unemployment and core inflation. For
GDP growth, the forecasts centered
at 3.5 percent for 2006 and between
3 and 3.5 percent 2007; unemployment
is expected to be between 4.5 and 5
percent in the fourth quarter of
2006 and between 4.75 and 5 percent
the fourth quarter of 2007.
Expectations for the core personal
consumption expenditure (PCE) price
index were in a range of 1-3/4 to
2-1/2 percent this year, centered at
about 2 percent, and in a range of
1-3/4 to 2 percent in 2007.
Of the three variables, the PCE
price index is the one the Fed
worries about most and is best able
to influence through its actions.
Hence, the forecast for the PCE
price index is a pretty good
indicator of Feds inflation target,
and targeting core inflation below 2
percent portends a tight monetary
policy.
The Fed Chairmans effectiveness
is significantly determined by his
credibility with financial markets.
If the economy slows but inflation
is harnessed, Wall Street will crown
Bernanke Caesar but if inflation
gets out of control the same throng
will make him the goat. All this
compels conservative policies from a
new Fed Chairman even when that is
not good for the economy.
China and other Asian economies
continue to soak up more and more
oil and other resources. Although
upward pressure on commodity prices
have not filtered through to core
consumer prices, the Fed is likely
to err on the side of caution and
hit the breaks too hard.
That would force a severe
adjustment in the housing market and
push up household savings a lot but
it would kill the economic
expansion. Downside risks are
growing.
Peter Morici is an economist and
professor at the Robert H. Smith
School of Business, the University
of Maryland, College Park, MD.
E-mail:
pmorici@rhsmith.umd.edu